Semgrep vs StackHawk

Side-by-side comparison of Semgrep and StackHawk: pricing, features, API access, and community ratings.

AI comparison summary

TL;DR: Semgrep focuses on static analysis (SAST) that scans code without running it, offering broad coverage including secrets detection and open-source malware protection with an active community. StackHawk specializes in dynamic testing (DAST) that attacks your running application to find only exploitable vulnerabilities, making it particularly valuable for AI coding agents that can auto-fix issues before commit. Choose Semgrep for comprehensive pre-commit code scanning with open-source flexibility, or StackHawk if you need runtime verification that vulnerabilities are actually exploitable and want integration into automated coding workflows.

Semgrep
Semgrep

AI-assisted SAST, SCA, and Secrets Detection for modern development teams

Visit
StackHawk
StackHawk

The security feedback layer for coding agents — find, fix, and verify vulnerabilities before commit.

Visit
Category
AI security
AI security
Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Starting price
USD 30/mo
USD 10/mo
Free tier
Audience
All audiences
All audiences
API available
Open source
Self-hostable
Model provider
Semgrep AI (proprietary multimodal)
Founded
2020
Headquarters
San Francisco, USA
Colorado, US
Key strengths
  • ·AI-assisted SAST, SCA, and secrets scanning in one platform
  • ·Low false positives (80% fewer false positives)
  • ·Rule-based and AI multimodal detection
  • ·Open-source engine with community rules registry
  • ·Integrates into AI coding agent loop (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Codex, Antigravity)
  • ·Runtime DAST scanning against running apps — only surfaces exploitable vulnerabilities
  • ·Agent-driven find, fix, and verify loop before PR is opened
  • ·No net-new vulnerabilities shipped; backlog reduction