Make vs Pipedream
Side-by-side comparison of Make and Pipedream: pricing, features, API access, and community ratings.
TL;DR: Make emphasizes visual workflow building with drag-and-drop simplicity, making it more accessible for non-technical users despite supporting both audiences. Pipedream is built specifically as an infrastructure layer for AI agents with features like MCP server support and per-user credential injection, plus it offers significantly more prebuilt components (10,000+ vs 1,500+) and eliminates OAuth setup overhead. Choose Make for traditional visual automation workflows, or Pipedream if you're building AI-powered integrations or need deeper programmatic control without infrastructure management.
Make Visual no-code automation platform — connect apps and automate workflows with a drag-and-drop builder. | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & agents | Automation & agents |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting price | USD 9/mo | USD 99/mo |
| Free tier | ||
| Audience | All audiences | All audiences |
| API available | ||
| Open source | ||
| Self-hostable | ||
| Model provider | Make AI Provider (own LLM), plus bring-your-own LLM key | |
| Founded | 2012 | |
| Headquarters | Prague, CZ | |
| Key strengths |
|
|