Greenhouse vs Humanly

Side-by-side comparison of Greenhouse and Humanly: pricing, features, API access, and community ratings.

AI comparison summary

TL;DR: Greenhouse is a comprehensive enterprise ATS platform with full hiring lifecycle management, structured hiring methodology, and extensive integrations, while Humanly is a lighter, more affordable recruiting assistant that focuses specifically on automating candidate conversations and screening. Choose Greenhouse if you need an all-in-one system to replace your entire hiring infrastructure, or Humanly if you want to add AI chat and screening capabilities to your existing ATS. Humanly offers a free tier making it more accessible for smaller teams or those wanting to test AI recruiting tools first.

Greenhouse
Greenhouse

The only AI-powered hiring platform you'll ever need — from sourcing to onboarding

Visit
Humanly
Humanly

AI-powered recruiting assistant for faster, fairer hiring conversations

Visit
Category
Chat assistants
Chat assistants
Pricing
Paid
Freemium
Starting price
Free tier
Audience
All audiences
All audiences
API available
Open source
Self-hostable
Model provider
Greenhouse AI (proprietary, including Ezra AI Labs acquisition)
OpenAI
Founded
2012
2019
Headquarters
New York, USA
Seattle, United States
Key strengths
  • ·End-to-end ATS from sourcing to onboarding
  • ·AI-powered tools including Notetaker, Candidate Question Agent, and Voice AI
  • ·Structured hiring methodology to reduce bias
  • ·Hundreds of pre-built integrations for flexible tech stacks
  • ·AI-driven candidate screening and chat
  • ·Automated interview scheduling
  • ·Bias-reduction features for fairer hiring
  • ·Seamless ATS integrations