Continue vs Kilo Code
Side-by-side comparison of Continue and Kilo Code: pricing, features, API access, and community ratings.
TL;DR: Continue pioneered open-source AI coding tools before being acquired by Cursor, offering solid BYOM flexibility but now has uncertain future development. Kilo Code is the more actively developed option with significantly broader model selection (500+ models vs basic BYOM), advanced features like auto-routing for cost optimization, specialized agent modes, and cloud agents with parallel worktrees. If you want cutting-edge features and aggressive cost management, choose Kilo Code; if you prefer the simplicity of Continue's established base, note its development may be winding down post-acquisition.
Continue Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains with bring-your-own-model flexibility | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Coding & development | Coding & development |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Starting price | Free | USD 15/mo |
| Free tier | ||
| Audience | Technical | All audiences |
| API available | ||
| Open source | ||
| Self-hostable | ||
| Model provider | Multi-provider (500+ models across 60+ providers including Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Azure, AWS Bedrock, Ollama, LM Studio, and others via Kilo Gateway or BYOK) | |
| Founded | 2023 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | US | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Key strengths |
|
|