Continue vs Cursor

Side-by-side comparison of Continue and Cursor: pricing, features, API access, and community ratings.

AI comparison summary

Continue offers bring-your-own-model flexibility and is fully open-source, making it ideal if you want control over your AI provider or need to self-host. Cursor is a more polished, feature-rich product with superior codebase-wide understanding and multi-file editing capabilities, but locks you into their platform and model choices. Since Cursor acquired Continue, the open-source project's future development is uncertain, while Cursor receives active investment as the flagship product. Choose Continue for flexibility and open-source principles, or Cursor for the most advanced AI coding experience with less configuration needed.

Continue
Continue

Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains with bring-your-own-model flexibility

Visit
Cursor
Cursor

AI-first code editor built on VS Code — full codebase context, not just the open file.

Visit
Category
Coding & development
Coding & development
Pricing
Free
Freemium
Starting price
Free
USD 20/mo
Free tier
Audience
Technical
Technical
API available
Open source
Self-hostable
Model provider
Anthropic / OpenAI
Founded
2023
2022
Headquarters
US
San Francisco, US
Key strengths
  • ·Open-source coding agent
  • ·Acquired by Cursor
  • ·Pioneer in AI developer tooling
  • ·Agentic coding (autonomous agents that plan, build, test, and demo features)
  • ·Multi-model support (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Grok, Cursor models)
  • ·IDE integration with AI-powered code completion and editing
  • ·Cloud agents running in parallel on ambitious tasks