Checkmarx vs Cycode

Side-by-side comparison of Checkmarx and Cycode: pricing, features, API access, and community ratings.

AI comparison summary

TL;DR: Both are enterprise AppSec platforms emphasizing AI-assisted security, but Checkmarx leads with broader market recognition (Gartner/Forrester leader status) and massive scale (800B+ lines analyzed monthly), while Cycode differentiates with superior false positive reduction (94% fewer vs. competitors) and dramatically faster remediation times (17x faster MTTR). Checkmarx offers hybrid AI+rules scanning with Anthropic integration, whereas Cycode focuses on autonomous remediation through its Maestro AI orchestration. Choose Checkmarx for established leadership and comprehensive coverage, or Cycode for leaner operations with faster, more accurate results.

Checkmarx
Checkmarx

Agentic AI-powered application security platform for the era of AI-generated code

Visit
Cycode
Cycode

The Agentic Development Security Platform — AI writes the code, we secure and govern it.

Visit
Category
AI security
AI security
Pricing
Enterprise
Enterprise
Starting price
Free tier
Audience
All audiences
Technical
API available
Open source
Self-hostable
Model provider
Anthropic
Multiple (Frontier Labs / proprietary AI)
Founded
2006
2019
Headquarters
Ramat Gan, Israel
Tel Aviv, Israel
Key strengths
  • ·Hybrid scanning combining rules-based precision with AI (Anthropic)
  • ·Highest fidelity vulnerability detection (11% higher true-positive rate, 2.5x higher F1 score than average SAST tools)
  • ·AI-powered security agents (Developer Assist, Triage & Remediation Assist)
  • ·AI supply chain security (AI-BOM, LLM scanning, MCP scanning)
  • ·Agentic Development Security (ADLC)
  • ·AI-powered SAST and code scanning
  • ·Context Intelligence Graph for correlated risk
  • ·Maestro AI orchestration for autonomous remediation