Agno vs Mastra

Side-by-side comparison of Agno and Mastra: pricing, features, API access, and community ratings.

AI comparison summary

TL;DR: Agno is a Python-based framework emphasizing enterprise governance (RBAC, audit logs, HITL) and BYOC deployment with 50+ production-ready API endpoints, while Mastra is TypeScript-native focused on long-running agents with durable workflows and built-in observability tooling. Choose Agno if you need enterprise controls and Python infrastructure, or Mastra if you're in a TypeScript stack and need robust observability for agents that execute over extended periods. Both are open-source and freemium, but Agno provides API access while Mastra centers on its Studio interface.

Agno
Agno

Open-source agent framework and high-performance runtime for building multi-agent systems at scale

Visit
Mastra
Mastra

Build AI agents. Build, observe, and improve agents that run for days with Mastra, the leading TypeScript agent framework.

Visit
Category
Agent frameworks
Agent frameworks
Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Starting price
Free tier
Audience
Technical
All audiences
API available
Open source
Self-hostable
Model provider
Multi-provider (30+ model providers)
Multi-provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI, and others via Mastra model router)
Founded
Headquarters
Key strengths
  • ·Open-source Python framework for rapid agent development
  • ·AgentOS runtime with 50+ API endpoints out of the box
  • ·Supports 30+ LLM providers behind a single unified API surface
  • ·BYOC (Bring Your Own Cloud) with full data privacy — no data leaves your environment
  • ·TypeScript-native agent framework
  • ·Built-in observability (traces, metrics, evals, datasets)
  • ·Durable workflows with typed control flow
  • ·Observational memory and semantic recall