Activepieces vs Zapier
Side-by-side comparison of Activepieces and Zapier: pricing, features, API access, and community ratings.
TL;DR: Zapier offers significantly more app integrations (9,000+ vs 700+) and is purpose-built for non-technical users, while Activepieces stands out as an open-source, self-hostable alternative with unlimited free executions when self-hosted—making it far more cost-effective at scale. Both provide enterprise governance and AI agent capabilities, but Activepieces gives you infrastructure control and zero per-execution costs, whereas Zapier trades that flexibility for the largest integration ecosystem and more polished non-technical UX. Choose Zapier for maximum app coverage and ease-of-use, or Activepieces if you want infrastructure ownership and predictable costs.
Activepieces AI-first automation platform for every team — connect apps, build agents, and govern at scale | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & agents | Automation & agents |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting price | USD 19.99/mo | |
| Free tier | ||
| Audience | All audiences | Non-technical |
| API available | ||
| Open source | ||
| Self-hostable | ||
| Model provider | OpenAI | |
| Founded | 2022 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | US | |
| Key strengths |
|
|
